Veto-by-Proxy

 

Veto-by-Proxy

 

AKA: Are You Helping or Not?

In many organisations, individuals with approval authority, or influence over those who hold it, employ a subtle yet highly damaging tactic known as veto by proxy. They never explicitly refuse support, nor do they formally block progress. Instead, they create conditions that make advancement so difficult that the initiative falters, all while maintaining the outward appearance of enthusiastic endorsement.

Veto by proxy is the pernicious practice of stopping something without ever being seen to oppose it. The behaviour is rarely obvious at first. It emerges gradually through a pattern of contradictions, inconsistencies and seemingly minor actions that, over time, indicate that something is not as it appears.

Recognising Veto by Proxy Behaviour

Although understated, veto by proxy behaviour follows recognisable patterns. Common indicators include:

  • Excessive focus on trivial risks or issues, often amounting to nit picking.
  • Continually seeking unnecessary enhancements, sometimes referred to as gilding the lily.
  • Complaining about matters that are irrelevant to the initiative, creating diversion.
  • Using divisive or confusing messaging.
  • Delivering carefully crafted but contradictory statements.
  • Behaving as though inconsistencies do not exist.
  • Making ambiguity impossible to discuss, and making legitimate topics undiscussable.
  • Creating conflict or confusion among peers.
  • Setting unrealistic, overly aggressive or impossible targets.
  • Introducing administrative delays and hiding behind process.
  • Deflecting attention onto unrelated priorities.

Individually, these behaviours may appear harmless. Taken together, they form a pattern of obstruction that can quietly undermine even the strongest programme.

Prevention Is Difficult and Cure Is Harder

People often express what they perceived to be “the required opinion” when it is politically or financially convenient. This does not change their underlying beliefs or their willingness to support the initiative. Their actions, whether conscious or unconscious, will still be shaped by bias.

The most effective prevention is early and genuine engagement. Ensuring that stakeholders are truly committed reduces the tendency toward covert resistance. However, once veto by proxy begins, the behaviour typically compounds and escalates as the initiative gains momentum. Individuals may attempt to conceal their previous actions to avoid future accountability, or to avoid losing face, creating a web of contradictions, half truths and defensive behaviours[1]. The eventual cover up is often more damaging than the original obstruction and so the pattern repeats.

Addressing Veto by Proxy

The only meaningful way to counter veto by proxy is to bring the behaviour into the open. This requires:

  • Challenging the narrative directly.
  • Questioning motivations with clarity and precision.
  • Gathering detailed and evidence based examples.
  • Asking “why?” repeatedly and refusing to accept superficial answers.

These conversations should begin privately. Public confrontation too early will only drive the behaviour further underground. Individuals who engage in veto by proxy will often have extensive justifications for their actions. Persistence is essential, as appeasement simply reinforces the behaviour. With consistent challenge, the obstruction usually diminishes quietly.

Importantly, nobody needs to lose face. The aim is not to shame but to realign. If the individual recommits to supporting the initiative openly and constructively, there is no need for anyone to know they were ever opposed to it. That assurance, combined with the implied alternative of public exposure, is often sufficient to bring the behaviour to an end.

 


[1] Argyris 1990 – Overcoming Organizational Defenses pp.27

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When you're up to your neck in Crocodiles

Image
  .......It’s hard to remember that the original objective was to drain the swamp   (yes that is me……….and yes they are real life massive Alligators……………and yes they really are about 5 feet away)     AKA: THE IMPORTANCE OF DOCUMENTATION (and the Law of Sufficiency )   FACT:    Selective memory, confirmation bias and revisionism are common human traits, and stakeholders, sponsors and project teams are no more immune to them than anyone else.                          At the same time, documentation is often perceived as an unnecessary burden. The time and effort required to record information, validate details and maintain accurate artefacts can create significant drag on a project. As a result, there is a natural temptation to avoid writing things down, to skip over the need to capture key decisions and events, and simply press ahead. The mindset becomes one of “ j...
Read more

SEPs and Avoiding the Body Brothers

Image
Somebody Else’s Problem: The Invisible Threat to Programme Success Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy introduces the wonderfully absurd concept of the Somebody Else’s Problem (S.E.P.) field [1] —a device that renders objects effectively invisible by exploiting the human tendency to ignore anything too inconvenient to accept. As Adams puts it, an S.E.P. works because “any problems one may have understanding it… become Somebody Else’s Problem” . A starship disguised as a giant pink elephant at a cricket match becomes unnoticeable not because it cannot be seen, but because the mind refuses to acknowledge something so implausible. While Adams’ example is comic fiction, the behavioural principle behind it is very real. In academia, the psychological phenomenon known as diffusion of responsibility [3] describes how individuals are less likely to take action when others are present and theoretically able to do so. This tendency to ignore issues deemed “out of scope” can ...
Read more

F*** the Problem........................Fix the People

Image
Why Affinity Bias Can Make or Break Delivery                It’s who you are, and how you do it!.........not what you do or what you’ve done!                                                                                             When things go wrong, it is stressful for everyone involved. It can also be a lonely and disempowering experience for those who depend on a resolution but cannot contribute to it. Buyers and customers often have no choice but to sit and wait. Delivering an excellent fix rarely restores harmony on its own. The unspoken frustration remains: " it should not have gone wrong in the first place" .   An old mentor of mine used to say, “ Fix the people, not the problem ,” (or less polite wo...
Read more